More:
Original public domain image from Flickr
VAR did not merely alter the game; it fundamentally dismantled and rebuilt the structure of the betting markets. This is an evolution most bookmakers have yet to accurately reflect in their pricing. The VAR impact on betting markets is arguably the biggest structural shift in football wagering since in-play betting was introduced, and heading into World Cup 2026, the edges it creates are still there for those paying attention.
Why VAR Impact on Betting Markets Matters at World Cup 2026
VAR arrived at the World Cup in 2018. The effects were immediate. They were also permanent.
A record number of penalties were awarded at the 2018 World Cup — 29 in total, a full 11 more than the next highest past tournament. That is not a marginal change. That is a structural transformation of how goals are scored at the biggest tournament in football.
The betting markets in 2018 were simply not built for that reality. Penalty taker markets were priced with pre-VAR frequency assumptions. First goalscorer odds did not account for the probability of a soft spot-kick early in a match. As a result, bettors who understood the shift made consistent returns in markets that were built on outdated data.
Heading into World Cup 2026, the VAR impact on betting markets continues to evolve. With more matches and enhanced ball-tracking technology at the 2026 tournament, referees are expected to identify more fouls and handballs, making penalty takers even more important when analysing World Cup odds and potential goalscorer markets.
The expanded 48-team format means more group-stage matches and more VAR decisions. The volume of intervention is going up. Not all markets reflect that. As the tournament scale to unprecedented proportions, the sheer frequency of reviews will inevitably create a volatility that traditional models are unprepared to handle. This creates a massive blind spot in live betting, where delay between a foul and a VAR-overturned penalty offers a high stakes window of opportunity for the sharpest observers. Be the one to take these observations and do your own responsible consolidation of views to cash in.
Tactical Analysis: The Markets That Adjusted — and Those That Didn’t
Some markets adapted quickly. Others remain mispriced.
The markets that adjusted:
Bookmakers now build penalty frequency assumptions into Over/Under totals. The shift is clear. Goals scored from set plays increased from 22 percent in the 2014 World Cup to 39 percent in the 2018 World Cup — an increase directly attributed to VAR awarding more penalties. Over 2.5 goals markets now reflect that reality more accurately than they did in 2018.
In-play markets also adapted. Bookmakers introduced special markets that consider potential VAR reviews — including odds on whether a goal will be disallowed, whether a penalty review will be successful, or if a red card decision will be overturned. These niche markets now exist precisely because the VAR impact on betting markets demanded them.
The markets that haven’t adjusted:
First goalscorer markets remain the most obvious inefficiency. In 2018, Harry Kane scored six goals — 50 percent of which came from the penalty spot. However, his first goalscorer price in each of those matches did not reflect an elevated penalty probability. That gap still exists for designated penalty takers. Specifically, it exists in group-stage matches involving lower-ranked opponents where VAR-induced spot-kicks are most likely.
Corner kick-related betting is another lagging market. In the VAR era, when close physical contact at set pieces is more likely to be penalised, there is a stronger case for aggressive corner delivery leading to penalty decisions. Yet most corner-related markets are priced on pre-VAR frequency data.
Finally, anytime goalscorer markets for penalty takers are consistently underpriced in tight, low-scoring matches. In tight, tactical matches where chances are limited, a single VAR decision can change everything — backing a penalty taker gives a built-in safety net.
The 2026 tournament also introduces an altitude variable. In cities like Mexico City, thinner air reduces drag on the ball — causing players to overhit penalties if they fail to adjust, potentially producing more missed spot-kicks than in previous tournaments.Additionally, don’t forget the modern day corner theat. That is a wrinkle almost no market has begun to price.
Verdict: Follow the Penalty Takers, Ignore the Rest
The VAR impact on betting markets at World Cup 2026 is clearest in one place: back confirmed penalty takers in the anytime goalscorer market at every group-stage fixture. That edge persists because the market prices goals, not mechanisms. For outright tournament bets, prioritise teams with elite, reliable spot-kick takers — Kane, Messi, and Mbappé all fall into that bracket. One VAR decision per game changes everything. Back the players who benefit most when it arrives.